.
Feedback

Supervisors Put Off Vote On Berrellesa Palms Bond

The county will hold off issuing $18 million in bonds for the project until the city decides whether it supports the change in tenants.

The Board of Supervisors Tuesday delayed a vote on issuing $18 million worth of bonds for a 49-unit Section 8 housing project in Martinez, agreeing to hold off on a decision until the City Council has a chance to revisit the project.

“We want to make it clear that this is not a role the county is playing,” said supervisor Federal Glover, who represents Martinez. “This is a request that comes from the city. I’m asking for a continuance because it’s unclear whether the city is supporting this project. I don’t want the county to be seen as supporting it when it’s not clear the city is supporting it.”

The county is “acting as a conduit” for issuing the multi-family housing bonds, according to county planning staff, and if the supervisors decide not to issue the bonds, the developer – Resources for Community Development of Berkeley – could find another issuer.

The city approved the 49-unit Berrellesa Palms project in 2009, and won a court ruling after opponents sued the city, saying the project was too big, did not adhere to the Downtown Specific Plan, and was not in a safe location for seniors.

In January, when RCD advised the city that it could not find funding for the original plan of 30 percent very low income (Section 8) tenants, and would instead seek funding for a 100 percent Section 8 population, some members of the City Council balked.  

Councilman Mike Menesini was especially put off by the change in tenancy, and city staff was asked to investigate whether the change in tenant status violated the conditions of approval.

Meanwhile, councilwoman Janet Kennedy remains a staunch supporter of the project, and believes that it remains an important asset for the community.

“It’s exactly the same project,” Kennedy told the supervisors on Tuesday. “It’s just all low-income population now. It’s still an independent living facility. There’s no change in use, just a change in income. It’s a $20 million investment in our city.”

But opponent Kathi McLaughlin told the board that the project was “an unresolved local land use issue. This is a three-story building originally designed for active seniors who can mostly take care of themselves. There is only one elevator in a three-story building.”

“We were told this would bring $800,000 of spending into our community,” said Planning Commissioner Harriett Burt. “We felt it would be a nice addition to our community. Then in out of the blue was this change.”

The supervisors voted unanimously to postpone a vote on the bond until the city determines if it supports the latest iteration of RCD’s plan. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Martinez Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
margot bray May 24, 2013 at 12:03 pm
When in doubt, don't. Your safety when you travel is always the most important and when you areRead More concerned about something, asking is good, but remember any town now has people with nothing better to do and your car etc. might be just what they are looking for to break in or worse. I'm a worry wart, but, no one is safe all the time even in cute, sweet, old fashioned Martinez.
Palermo May 20, 2013 at 03:32 pm
I have found it's very hard to find a parking spot there. Another negative is the number of theRead More "constant outsdoorsmen" types lurking all around. I've been confronted several times and worried about leaving my car there.
Barbara Glenn May 23, 2013 at 06:30 am
The Fire Crew worked very late into the night and into the next morning. The Police were alsoRead More working nearby, picking up some of the dead baby animals that were hit on the road, displaced by the fire.
Photo Provided by Paramount Pictures
Beau Behan May 17, 2013 at 09:36 am
Hi Robert, Thanks for dropping in and checking out the blog. The new Patch look is so 'new' as I amRead More still learning to navigate through. Just updated it and added the link to my film review. Thanks again. Cheers!
Robert Rothgery May 17, 2013 at 09:30 am
I am happy to know that Mr. Behan's review of "STID" is now available. Might we knowRead More where it is available? Perhaps I am just an Apple lovin' technopeasant, but despite my frantic serial clicking on text without links, I could not find the actual story. Alas and alack I may never know why there is no darkness in "...Into Darkness" (or Lightness). Oh, and welcome back Jim!
Dick Duncan May 22, 2013 at 09:55 am
Do City Council members still get free parking passes as perk?
Palermo May 20, 2013 at 03:30 pm
The main reason I don't go to any of the businesses downtown is the lack of parking. What littleRead More there is is taken up by the owners of these establishments. God forbid they park somewhere else less convenient so actual paying customers can frequent their businesses.
Captain Bebops May 19, 2013 at 09:47 am
Jim, then that's yet another penalty for showing up for jury duty. The system needs a big overhaul.Read More