.
Feedback

Council to Revisit Cell Antenna Challenge

Verizon hints at lawsuit if the council grants an appeal by neighbors; residents raise safety concerns, impact on property values.

Tonight, the city council will revisit a proposal by Verizon Wireless to erect an antenna on an existing PG&E tower. 

A public hearing July 11 drew threats of a lawsuit if the city granted neighbors’ appeal, thwarting the company’s plans.

Since then, the telecommunications giant examined 10 potential alternatives to the facility, a private residential lot at 814 Carter Acres Lane.

The antenna would provide wireless coverage in parts of the Alhambra Valley without service. Neighbors voiced concerns about property values and health and safety concerns.

A lawyer for Verizon said the proposed addition posed no significant impact on the surrounding homes and dismissed concerns about radiation. In addition, Paul Albritton told the council members that since the city already approved a T-Mobile antenna on the site, they may be courting a lawsuit.

“That can constitute discrimination under the telecommunications act,” Albritton said.

But Ari Lauer, a lawyer for the neighbors, rebuffed the claim, saying the courts have upheld discrimination based on zoning regulations.

Resident Christine Charmer said residents had only acquiesced to the T-Mobile antenna because they were promised it would be the only one.

The Martinez City Council meets at 7 p.m. at City Hall, 525 Henrietta St.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Martinez Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Palermo May 20, 2013 at 03:32 pm
I have found it's very hard to find a parking spot there. Another negative is the number of theRead More "constant outsdoorsmen" types lurking all around. I've been confronted several times and worried about leaving my car there.
Photo Provided by Paramount Pictures
Beau Behan May 17, 2013 at 09:36 am
Hi Robert, Thanks for dropping in and checking out the blog. The new Patch look is so 'new' as I amRead More still learning to navigate through. Just updated it and added the link to my film review. Thanks again. Cheers!
Robert Rothgery May 17, 2013 at 09:30 am
I am happy to know that Mr. Behan's review of "STID" is now available. Might we knowRead More where it is available? Perhaps I am just an Apple lovin' technopeasant, but despite my frantic serial clicking on text without links, I could not find the actual story. Alas and alack I may never know why there is no darkness in "...Into Darkness" (or Lightness). Oh, and welcome back Jim!
Palermo May 20, 2013 at 03:30 pm
The main reason I don't go to any of the businesses downtown is the lack of parking. What littleRead More there is is taken up by the owners of these establishments. God forbid they park somewhere else less convenient so actual paying customers can frequent their businesses.
Captain Bebops May 19, 2013 at 09:47 am
Jim, then that's yet another penalty for showing up for jury duty. The system needs a big overhaul.Read More
Jim Caroompas May 19, 2013 at 09:27 am
The city is no longer paying for juror parking. In other words, juror or not, if your meter hasRead More expired, you pay.